Eaton Fire area open now?

Trip planning, history, announcements, books, movies, opinions, etc.
User avatar
dima
Posts: 1790
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:35 am
Location: Los Angeles

Post by dima »

I'm looking on ANF alerts page. The original closure order expired. Are we good now? Anybody hear anything?
User avatar
Matthew
Supercaff
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 8:25 am
Location: Pasadena

Post by Matthew »

I think you gotta wait for a forest closure termination order that has a termination date. You'll see those for the bridge fire
stoke is high
User avatar
Taco
Snownado survivor
Posts: 6161
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 4:35 pm

Post by Taco »

A trail runner I know went for a run through there. That's all I've got.
User avatar
Sewellymon
Posts: 112
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:55 pm

Post by Sewellymon »

you can check Strava to see what people are poaching. i know lots of folks going up Chaney Trial/ Mt. Lowe Rd, for instance...
User avatar
David R
OG of the SG
Posts: 633
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:28 pm

Post by David R »

The order is over but it sounds like when they wake up and realize this that they will extend it.
User avatar
AW~
Posts: 2099
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:00 pm

Post by AW~ »

would concur....friends of Eaton facebook had a nice post of myeatoncanyon. The recovery has been delayed.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/76938058649/

There will be a large group of hikers seeing the greenery and water...so I dont know if this can be stopped this spring. I hope it cant be stopped.
User avatar
Sean
Cucamonga
Posts: 4267
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:32 pm

Post by Sean »

I drove by the Eaton Canyon Natural Area on Saturday and the entrances are all still fenced off and closed with warning signs. So even if they don't renew the closure order, the main trailheads in Altadena are inaccessible. Also, the Arroyos and Foothills Conservancy hasn't reopened the Rubio Canyon Preserve. My trail crew hasn't finished restoring the trails. And I think nature needs another year or two to revegetate the area and reshape the water course. We probably won't be able to restore the main Rubio Creek crossing for another year. This last series of storms finally washed away a lot of sediment, and the crossing might be close to the bedrock now, but we need to see what happens with all the upstream debris coming down.
IMG_20260103_082247382_HDR.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
HikeUp
Posts: 4049
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:21 pm

Post by HikeUp »

I read on some facebook post out of Sierra Madre that the closure order has been extended. I'm too lazy to try and find real evidence of this.

For those who are good at research...go for it :) lol
User avatar
Sean
Cucamonga
Posts: 4267
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:32 pm

Post by Sean »

They extended it for another two years.
User avatar
HikeUp
Posts: 4049
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:21 pm

Post by HikeUp »

Sean wrote: Tue Jan 06, 2026 6:28 pm They extended it for another two years.
Thanks Sean. As I previously mentioned in the Mt. Wilson Trail maintenance thread, it looks like everything to the east of the Mt. Wilson Trail is now open and that everything west of the Mt. Wilson Trail is still closed.
User avatar
dima
Posts: 1790
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:35 am
Location: Los Angeles

Post by dima »

The new map shows Mt Lowe rd as the border. What does that mean about Mt Lowe Rd?
User avatar
HikeUp
Posts: 4049
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:21 pm

Post by HikeUp »

dima wrote: Tue Jan 06, 2026 10:03 pm The new map shows Mt Lowe rd as the border. What does that mean about Mt Lowe Rd?
I would interpret it as the road is open. Same as mt. Wilson trail is open.

Is that what you're asking?
User avatar
dima
Posts: 1790
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:35 am
Location: Los Angeles

Post by dima »

HikeUp wrote: Tue Jan 06, 2026 10:28 pm
dima wrote: Tue Jan 06, 2026 10:03 pm The new map shows Mt Lowe rd as the border. What does that mean about Mt Lowe Rd?
I would interpret it as the road is open. Same as mt. Wilson trail is open.

Is that what you're asking?
That's what I was asking. Thanks.
User avatar
HikeUp
Posts: 4049
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:21 pm

Post by HikeUp »

not sure if this duplicates the link Sean provided..sorry if it is. Damn I'm getting really lazy.

https://www.fs.usda.gov/r05/angeles/ale ... yBdeBv2Xcg
User avatar
AW~
Posts: 2099
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:00 pm

Post by AW~ »

Well, I asked AI if it was safe to go to Rubio..joining the modern trend.
It said Rubio was closed due to its programming that land managers have authority.
As time went on I think it was agreeing with me, or it could be condescending...but it had to go with land mangers know best.
Later it agreed with me..? Then it was like my 'best friend'?

Overall not too bad. It summarizes well imo. "The peril of written history(the nanny state)"
So what changed? It wasnt me, but "sources", which were its collective direction. So there was "the truth" and "your truth".
User avatar
Sean
Cucamonga
Posts: 4267
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:32 pm

Post by Sean »

AW~ wrote: Thu Jan 08, 2026 9:04 am Well, I asked AI if it was safe to go to Rubio...
Everyone knows Rubio's unsafe because Sasquatch.
User avatar
AW~
Posts: 2099
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:00 pm

Post by AW~ »

Sean wrote: Thu Jan 08, 2026 12:18 pm
AW~ wrote: Thu Jan 08, 2026 9:04 am Well, I asked AI if it was safe to go to Rubio...
Everyone knows Rubio's unsafe because Sasquatch.
Shoot, maybe. It takes too long to talk to AI. I typically have to mention high-level topics , like to a kid, to get answers that stick.
Its asking why doesnt the city of LA sell tickets on Air5...for the 3rd time.