Which topo map is Clearer?

Clothes, tools, technology, nutrition, training, techniques, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Hikin_Jim
Posts: 4686
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:04 pm

Post by Hikin_Jim »

I'm trying to upgrade the topo maps I put in my recent San Gorgonio Trails post.

Which topo map is clearer?

NEW
Image

OLD
Image

HJ
User avatar
Sean
Cucamonga
Posts: 4067
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:32 pm

Post by Sean »

I prefer the new one because I like the labels and lines to pop out more than the shading.
User avatar
mattmaxon
Posts: 1137
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:48 pm

Post by mattmaxon »

I suppose the one without the vegetation & shading is a bit more "better" but it is probably subjective.

I for one would use some other characters besides the "X" for locations
User avatar
John G
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 10:14 pm

Post by John G »

The "NEW" one is clearer
User avatar
HikeUp
Posts: 3937
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:21 pm

Post by HikeUp »

Neither. Where's the bar? :D
User avatar
Hikin_Jim
Posts: 4686
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:04 pm

Post by Hikin_Jim »

HikeUp wrote: Neither. Where's the bar? :D
:lol: That'll definitely make things clearer.

HJ
User avatar
Hikin_Jim
Posts: 4686
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:04 pm

Post by Hikin_Jim »

mattmaxon wrote: I for one would use some other characters besides the "X" for locations
Such as? But be aware that all I've got is my keyboard with MS Paint. The nice thing about an "X" is that the center is fairly clear as to it's position.

It's definitely hard to tell the difference between a black "X" for a camp and a blue "X" for water. I've thought about "W" for water...

HJ
User avatar
mattmaxon
Posts: 1137
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:48 pm

Post by mattmaxon »

You can use different Character maps in MS Paint

In this example I used the "Parksymbol" font Capital A


Image

http://www.fontspace.com/minnesota-depa ... on-symbols

http://www.nps.gov/hfc/carto/map-symbols.cfm
User avatar
mattmaxon
Posts: 1137
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:48 pm

Post by mattmaxon »

You could also use Caltopo and embed the map like I did here 8)

http://mattmaxon.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Hikin_Jim
Posts: 4686
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:04 pm

Post by Hikin_Jim »

That CalTop embed is pretty nice. I'd argue though that your map trace is incorrect near the wilderness boundary. :) The S Fork Trail goes through the saddle not up and over the shoulder of the mountain. I believe the topo map is simply wrong here.

The Park Symbols are nice, but they're a bit large and tend to obscure the topo map -- but they did give me some ideas. Here's what I've come up with using wingdings symbols. I think I like it, and it's a definite improvement over "X's":
Image

HJ
User avatar
mattmaxon
Posts: 1137
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:48 pm

Post by mattmaxon »

Yeah it is an improvement

I was just making an example. I did up date it with track data...
User avatar
Hikin_Jim
Posts: 4686
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:04 pm

Post by Hikin_Jim »

mattmaxon wrote: I did up date it with track data...
So your GPS data tracks with what the topo map says? Wow.

I mean, the trail is shown going up at least three contour lines (at least 120 feet) up and over a shoulder and then back down to meet the trail coming in from Poopout Hill. I've done that trail more times than I can remember. My experience is that the trail contours easterly, goes through the small saddle shown on the map, and then drops very slightly down to meet the trail coming in from Poopout Hill. The trail is very clearly going through a saddle.

Tom Harrison on his map shows both. :lol: (the very fact that he shows the route I'm describing is pretty good evidence that it is the route that actually exists).

Next time you're up that way, carefully examine the landscape. I'm pretty sure there's no trail up and over the shoulder. The trail goes through the saddle.

HJ
User avatar
mattmaxon
Posts: 1137
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:48 pm

Post by mattmaxon »

Hikin_Jim wrote:
mattmaxon wrote: I did up date it with track data...
So your GPS data tracks with what the topo map says? Wow.
NO No no...

The red line is my track. The yellow was the estimated track as shown on the map

I'd be willing to bet "Once upon a time" it was there... Like in 1900 or so
User avatar
Hikin_Jim
Posts: 4686
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:04 pm

Post by Hikin_Jim »

mattmaxon wrote: NO No no...
:lol: You're sure, now?
mattmaxon wrote: The red line is my track. The yellow was the estimated track as shown on the map.
OK, so we're in agreement.
mattmaxon wrote: I'd be willing to bet "Once upon a time" it was there... Like in 1900 or so
Maybe, but I wouldn't be surprised if it weren't just an error.

One of these days I really need to get a good GPS.

HJ
User avatar
Sean
Cucamonga
Posts: 4067
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:32 pm

Post by Sean »

Here's my track from a recent trip to Dollar Lake.
User avatar
Hikin_Jim
Posts: 4686
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:04 pm

Post by Hikin_Jim »

Nice track, Sean. Shows your route going right through the saddle.

HJ
User avatar
Taco
Snownado survivor
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 4:35 pm

Post by Taco »

I prefer the new style for planning trips. I can better see what kind of drop I'm coming up to, or how big a wall or something is just by glancing at it. Also, if the vegetation shown on the map is very accurate, it really helps when you're doing something new and want to find a less-brushy section of hell. :)

But the old one is good for basic navigation at it's purest. I would use this for certain kinds of outings.

Or something. 8)
User avatar
Hikin_Jim
Posts: 4686
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:04 pm

Post by Hikin_Jim »

Taco wrote: Or something. 8)
Well, I'm glad we cleared that up. :lol:

I'm continuing to update my San Gorgonio Wilderness Trails post. I now have just updated the Momyer - Vivian loop map.

HJ
User avatar
Hikin_Jim
Posts: 4686
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:04 pm

Post by Hikin_Jim »

Matt,

I downloaded those ttf's and got them working (they didn't seem to work until I put them in the "Microsoft Shared" folder for some reason although that shouldn't be necessary).

Some of those are really nice and will be useful for future maps (I probably won't go back and re-do everything immediately since it's a lot of work). Thanks very much for the tip.

HJ
Post Reply