Devils Punchbowl subpeak 4600+ 11/22/17

TRs for the San Gabriel Mountains.
Post Reply
User avatar
AW~
Posts: 2059
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:00 pm

Post by AW~ »

So like DavidR, I went off to the high desert to bag a peak, but this one was 500ft and 1 mile....supposedly.
Ive been coming here ,for I think 4 years, at autumn, so each time its looks the same as it always has. This time there was no snow on the PVR mountain tops though.
Each time Ive been here, Ive gone a different route, and each time its been the same type of features, but it seems to always deliver a solid surprise while being an excellent half-day.
This time, I was looking to get on top of a subpeak on the lower part of a ridge I call punchdrunk. It divides Devils Chair and Punchbowl. And like its companion ridge on the east, it has a upper and lower section.

From the punchbowl area, the only landmark that matters is a 300ft high slab that shoots up into the sky and this subpeak doesnt stand out.
On the east side of the ridge it stands out while driving the road, or from the south. Thats devils punchbowl for you.
I noticed on the maps it looked easier to approach from the south so off I went early morning.

I dont think I gained 100ft before the plan went sideways.It looked like the drainage went straight up so I took a left and ended up cliffed out.I went back down and up the earlier drainage it tossed me onto the east side of the main ridge. From there I saw the sub-peak. It sure didnt look only 400ft higher. I took a direct approach at it and ended up at a the bottom of dome that was I figured was at least 200ft high. So I went around it by dropping into this subpeak's main canyon and then bypassing the 'watercourse' to gain elevation. That got me within 30ft of the top....but it could have been 500 because there was no way I could gain the last part.
Still, the view was excellent for this area and was close to 360. There were a couple of narrow but wide enough slabs that extended off from the ridge, so I dibble-dabbled on those instead of climbing for dear life.

Then it was time for the descent of the eastern canyon, which I now had a good idea of what I was getting into. There were a number of obstacles, but the main feature were 2 short narrow sections. The highest elevation one was a downclimb that widened out at the end, which made for a short push out/swing out move/jump of about 7ft into soft sand. The other narrow one was too narrow for me to slither through so it was easy to stay higher and then wedge down slowly. Eventually the drainage ended into the main devils chair drainage and it was a shortish walk back to the car.

I visited the Abbey too. To see the 'christmas tree', which is a tall rectuangulish pine tree on their property. Nice place and friendly. The tree was is 2 trees, but the main one is still really nice. Disclaimer: its watered.

Beginning dome, in which the lower part of the slabs took me to the east. Only rock climbers can gain these domes/subpeaks typically.
tr1.jpg


The lower part of the subpeak, in the middle of the photo and the canyon on the left of it. The upper canyon is actually a nice little forested section.
tr2.jpg

The subpeak. Theres a bit of a chasm between the 2 of us(not that I have any chance of climbing up anyway), or I could worm out on the the super thin edge on the right with a crazy exposure. See last picture.


Start of first narrow section..
tr4.jpg


Near the end of the canyon
tr5.jpg

Abbey tree
tr6.jpg
tr3.jpg
User avatar
dima
Posts: 1442
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:35 am
Location: Los Angeles

Post by dima »

Where is this? Is the peak called out on the USGS topo, or it's some nameless thing you've been looking at?
User avatar
AW~
Posts: 2059
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:00 pm

Post by AW~ »

The location is 34.4145,-117.8507
Its nameless, but I think it has the best view of the nameless because you see both faults in the area and their uplifts.
Would have been even better if the high point was accessible.
User avatar
Sean
Cucamonga
Posts: 3929
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:32 pm

Post by Sean »

Thanks for the report. I've seen people on those rocks before. Looks fun.
Post Reply