Sean wrote: The risk of being shot by a hunter is historically practically nonexistent.
It's like winning the lottery. It happens only to a select few.
"On National Forest lands in 2002 and 2003, two Appalachian Trail hikers were shot by hunters who thought they were shooting at deer. Both hikers suffered serious injuries; both hunters were prosecuted."
- Appalachian Trail Conservancy
"SUBLIMITY, Ore. -- A 20-year-old hiker was killed after being accidentally shot by a hunter near Silver Creek Falls Friday night, police said."
- KING5.com, October 22, 2011
"A hunter mistook a Virginia college student for a deer and fired, killing her and injuring a companion "
- BackPacker.com, October, 2011
"A 54-year-old hiker was accidentally shot and killed by 14-year-old hunter on the Sauk Mountain Trail on Saturday."
- Washington Trails Association, August 4, 2008
"Flatwoods, La. - A turkey hunter from Rapides Parish faces a charge of negligent injury, after investigators say he accidentally shot a hiker in Natchitoches Parish."
- Fox8Live.com, April 27, 2012
"A deer hunter was found not guilty of manslaughter after a hiker was killed by a stray bullet in 2006, rekindling the debate over land use."
- TheStar.com, Ontario, Canada, November 6, 2006
And finally this from the High Country News (Colorado), May 29, 2006
Shooting at hikers is perfectly legal
My family and I almost became collateral damage at the end of a pleasant hike through Colorado's Roosevelt National Forest. We were walking on a trail north of the small town of Lyons, when bullets suddenly peppered the trees behind our backs. My 8-year-old son, in tears, flattened himself into the dirt, and though my wife screamed "hikers! hikers!" at the shooters, the bullets kept coming. But here's the real shock: While the shooters were undoubtedly careless and stupid, it was legal for them to fire their guns in our direction.