WEBSITES - Post links to useful websites!
- Cy Kaicener
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 5:19 am
There is a new website for the Crystal Lake Recreation Area. They are looking for volunteers for trail maintenance
http://www.crystallake.name/
I saw their post on http://www.summitpost.org in the Forum under California
http://www.crystallake.name/
I saw their post on http://www.summitpost.org in the Forum under California
Cool. I want to get with that volunteer trail fix group. I've seen some bad places and wanted to do something but wasn't sure if it was ok to do it. Like pack a pick and shovel and dig out some washed out areas on my own. I bet they would not let that happen. I bet it has to be supervised by a ranger.
Perry from the San Jacinto board has set up http://www.LAtrails.Net
I'm not crazy about the splintering of all these SoCal message boards, and never been crazy about Perry as a moderator/administrator (he seems like a nice guy, but is prone to banning, editing and deleting to keep his boards squeaky clean; some people like a squeaky clean board, I don't).
The San Jacinto board is otherwise pretty good with lots of traffic. The San Gorgonio board sucks ass.
Mebbe Taco needs to get up off his ass and get working on an ad-free all-encompassing SoCal hiking board. Icepirates.net?
I have a lot of experience with setting up message boards and don't mind fronting the bux (it doesn't cost that much to do):
http://www.guntards.net/forum
http://www.badharvest.net
http://www.mesatactical.com/forum
Problem is there's a lot of great info on this board and I'm not sure if MyFreeForum offers any tools to back up and transfer the forum. It wouldn't really be in their interest to do so. FluxBB does have tools to convert phpBB to FluxBB (which is, in my humble opinion, the beast free board software out there).
I'm not crazy about the splintering of all these SoCal message boards, and never been crazy about Perry as a moderator/administrator (he seems like a nice guy, but is prone to banning, editing and deleting to keep his boards squeaky clean; some people like a squeaky clean board, I don't).
The San Jacinto board is otherwise pretty good with lots of traffic. The San Gorgonio board sucks ass.
Mebbe Taco needs to get up off his ass and get working on an ad-free all-encompassing SoCal hiking board. Icepirates.net?
I have a lot of experience with setting up message boards and don't mind fronting the bux (it doesn't cost that much to do):
http://www.guntards.net/forum
http://www.badharvest.net
http://www.mesatactical.com/forum
Problem is there's a lot of great info on this board and I'm not sure if MyFreeForum offers any tools to back up and transfer the forum. It wouldn't really be in their interest to do so. FluxBB does have tools to convert phpBB to FluxBB (which is, in my humble opinion, the beast free board software out there).
Nunc est bibendum
My perception is that Perry is very supportive of free speech and has tended to wait until things are clearly out of hand before banning anyone. Taco's approach is similar. I have seen obvious abuses on both boards in the past and thought both moderators dealt with them rather well.simonov wrote:I'm not crazy about the splintering of all these SoCal message boards, and never been crazy about Perry as a moderator/administrator (he seems like a nice guy, but is prone to banning, editing and deleting to keep his boards squeaky clean; some people like a squeaky clean board, I don't).
I think Taco deals with them best by not dealing with them.AlanK wrote:My perception is that Perry is very supportive of free speech and has tended to wait until things are clearly out of hand before banning anyone. Taco's approach is similar. I have seen obvious abuses on both boards in the past and thought both moderators dealt with them rather well.simonov wrote:I'm not crazy about the splintering of all these SoCal message boards, and never been crazy about Perry as a moderator/administrator (he seems like a nice guy, but is prone to banning, editing and deleting to keep his boards squeaky clean; some people like a squeaky clean board, I don't).
Nunc est bibendum
I got that impression to. I actually like it. But am surprised that he allows ol Hal to post the stuff that he does. And more surprised that he asked me and not him if I knew the forum wasn't about fighting. I figure every forum is going to have it's unique ways.simonov wrote:I'm not crazy about the splintering of all these SoCal message boards, and never been crazy about Perry as a moderator/administrator (he seems like a nice guy, but is prone to banning, editing and deleting to keep his boards squeaky clean; some people like a squeaky clean board, I don't).
I don't know who is going to participate in that forum. Seems serious hikers would go to the mountains rather than those areas. Maybe I'm unaware of some reasons but it will be fun to find out what people like.
That one cracks me up! the guy named Ed.The San Jacinto board is otherwise pretty good with lots of traffic. The San Gorgonio board sucks ass.
My head has blown up instead.
I'd like to make an actual website with tons of info, with the theoretical/spiritual/whatever CENTER of this site being the forum, as people are the center of the activity.
OK, so if we make a big-damn-all-of-SoCal-board, what should it encompass? Just mountain-related, or all sports, or also offroading (I'm not against this!), etc etc?
I'm into the complete mountain experience. Climb in the winter, drive a rally-type car on otherwise quiet fire roads in the summer, swim in the summer, yadda yadda yadda, everything while treating the mountains with respect.
Throw down some ideas folks! I just don't know how to pay for it!
I'd like to make an actual website with tons of info, with the theoretical/spiritual/whatever CENTER of this site being the forum, as people are the center of the activity.
OK, so if we make a big-damn-all-of-SoCal-board, what should it encompass? Just mountain-related, or all sports, or also offroading (I'm not against this!), etc etc?
I'm into the complete mountain experience. Climb in the winter, drive a rally-type car on otherwise quiet fire roads in the summer, swim in the summer, yadda yadda yadda, everything while treating the mountains with respect.
Throw down some ideas folks! I just don't know how to pay for it!
I'm only interested in hiking in SoCal. I'd never seek out a forum on anything else. I might read a photography or mountain bike forum if a google search for trail info led me to it, otherwise I wouldn't seek it out. If the hiking info got buried or mixed in with other stuff to the point it is of no use, then I could see where you might lose a certain demographic. So...now you know how to get rid of me!TacoDelRio wrote:OK, so if we make a big-damn-all-of-SoCal-board, what should it encompass? Just mountain-related, or all sports, or also offroading (I'm not against this!), etc etc?
A seperate "forum" or subforum for each activity here, much like we have a Tralrunning one, a canyoneering/technical one, etc.
I figure if we make a total forum, it should really be "the big one", a go-to site for all SoCal mountian activities.
I figure if we make a total forum, it should really be "the big one", a go-to site for all SoCal mountian activities.
Taco has had to deal with some troublemakers and he handled it well. Ditto for Perry. Both give posters a lot of leeway before taking punitive action. I would say that both have handled things well, although with different styles.simonov wrote:I think Taco deals with them best by not dealing with them.
Okay, I'll lay down some Forum Filosophy here and see what you folks think.TacoDelRio wrote:A seperate "forum" or subforum for each activity here, much like we have a Tralrunning one, a canyoneering/technical one, etc.
I figure if we make a total forum, it should really be "the big one", a go-to site for all SoCal mountian activities.
First, I think it's kind of a pain to divide forums up into lots of little subforums unless you have a SHITLOAD of traffic. It's generally easier with a forum with our traffic level to confine most of the posts to a few busy subforums.
For example, the following subforums could easily be combined into a single forum concerning hiking and climbing in the San Gabriels and I don't think it would hurt anything:
--> General Discussion
--> Climbing, Canyoneering, & Mountaineering
--> Current Conditions
--> Flora and Fauna
--> Plans and Partners
--> Trip Reports
That leaves just:
--> Gear
(probably good as a separate forum)
--> GPS and Videos
(topics could easily be handled in the main forum, since videos are basically visual trip reports and GPS tracks are also usually associated with trip reports; discussions of GPS units and camcorders are appropriate in Gear)
--> LA Urban Hiking
--> Trail Running & Mountain Biking
(good prospects for separate forums, except no one ever posts there, though I know lots of people through OCHBC for whom urban is the only sort of hiking they do)
--> Questions and Comments
(every forum ought to have a place for forum-related meta-discussions)
--> Off Topic
(this forum is often used here for trip reports and other hiking related posts about San Gorgonio or San Jacinto, since they aren't strictly "on-topic" for the San Gabriel Mountains section, which is kind of a drag sometimes because they are about hiking and climbing and not really very "off-topic").
Forums should generally splinter into subforums as they become very busy and you need a way to break out the various discussions by subject matter. But starting out with a highly Balkanized forum, before you have a lot of traffic, just makes the forum harder to use.
Perry's forum is actually kind of nice, because it's simple:
--> Mt. San Jacinto & Santa Rosa Mountains
--> California: Other Areas
--> General Chat
Only criticism I would make of that is that "California: Other Areas" sure covers a lot of ground.
So here is a wild-ass suggestion for a general SoCal forum based on my discussion above as well as some suggestions already made in this thread:
HIKING AND CLIMBING
--> San Gabriel Mountains
--> San Gorgonio and San Bernardino Mountains
--> San Jacinto and Santa Rosas
(frankly, there's probably no reason you couldn't just cover all three of these with a single subforum called "SoCal Climbing")
--> Desert Hiking
(again, this invites confusion: is Rabbit Peak "desert hiking" or is it "Santa Rosas?")
--> Urban
--> Elsewhere (Sierras, Alps, Himalayas, etc)
(could also just eliminate Desert Hiking and make Elsewhere mean "anywhere that isn't in the SoCal mountains or urban areas")
--> Gear
OTHER THAN YER FEET
--> Mountain and Road Biking
--> Off-road (cars and trucks, I guess)
--> Motorcycles
--> Fun with Chainsaws
(I would resist trying to cater to hunters and gun nuts because they have PLENTY of forums of their own on the interwebs; I can't imagine what people who are into fishing would talk about amongst themselves).
OTHER CRAP
--> Off-topic Chat
--> Questions, Comments and Suggestions
With Guntards.net I have combined a forum with a sort of blog (though I stopped updating the blog a year ago). The blog format is just another way to organize content, with the only restriction being that only certain people can actually post articles to the blog; I don't know how to open up the blog software I use (Textpattern) to a large number of semi-trustworthy individuals the way SummitPost does, and I certainly can't integrate the logins of Textpattern and the forum, which would be a minimal requirement for something where users are posting blog articles as well as participating in forums.
Another (better) idea I have been working on for another site I run is instead of a separate blog, you have a front end to the site that looks a lot like a blog, but is really just displaying selected topics from the forum; the site administrator/moderator just selects topics he thinks are particularly cool and they get posted on the main page. Then anyone who wants to comment on the post can simply join the discussion in the forum. That allows every forum member to be a potential "blogger," at the discretion of the site administrator.
Anyway, there are some ideas. I've set up forums and blogs in the past, and I would be happy to set up a new site for the San Gabriel Mountains forum (to be the Southern California Outdoors or whatever site), and can even front the initial costs, which are not that much. I just don't want to be involved in running the site.
Also, I'd hate to see the information from this site go away, and I hope there is some way to transfer the database to a new site.
Nunc est bibendum
I try to keep my feelings out of most things.
I was a member of a forum that was really great. Talked to and met many folks from around the world. It was a survival related forum, mostly ex-Military folks from the US, UK, and Eastern Europe.
My buddy running it got his feelings in the way, and deleted the whole thing, all the posts, everything. Really not cool. Several years of work, down the drain. I use this as an example as to why an administrative body needs to be rather open and keep their emotions out of things.
I don't really have to deal with any trolls here, as we're all mature, etc. I've only "banned" spambots who never even got to post.
I'm sure any negative emotions regarding the forum are due to folks not filling out their profiles... hint hint at the few newest members.
I was a member of a forum that was really great. Talked to and met many folks from around the world. It was a survival related forum, mostly ex-Military folks from the US, UK, and Eastern Europe.
My buddy running it got his feelings in the way, and deleted the whole thing, all the posts, everything. Really not cool. Several years of work, down the drain. I use this as an example as to why an administrative body needs to be rather open and keep their emotions out of things.
I don't really have to deal with any trolls here, as we're all mature, etc. I've only "banned" spambots who never even got to post.
I'm sure any negative emotions regarding the forum are due to folks not filling out their profiles... hint hint at the few newest members.
And people who don't do caffeine. Yeah, that really gets him. But no worries, no one here would try to pull a stunt like that, now would they??FIGHT ON wrote:I've seen Perry ban 3 people. If Taco did it was before I came around.simonov wrote:I think Taco deals with them best by not dealing with them.
Nothin bothers Taco. NOTHIN. (cept maybe people who don't drink, don't cuss, don't smoke, don't climb, don't eat crap.)
oh yes, we speak in tongues when that subject arises. as it does expose ones secret vaintyHikin_Jim wrote:And people who don't do caffeine. Yeah, that really gets him. But no worries, no one here would try to pull a stunt like that, now would they??FIGHT ON wrote:I've seen Perry ban 3 people. If Taco did it was before I came around.simonov wrote:I think Taco deals with them best by not dealing with them.
Nothin bothers Taco. NOTHIN. (cept maybe people who don't drink, don't cuss, don't smoke, don't climb, don't eat crap.)
- Maxwell's Demon
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 7:26 pm
Could you provide some specific examples? If you are referring to a very fragile biological system that is close to the tram, have you seen how the tourists treat the wilderness?simonov wrote:...never been crazy about Perry as a moderator/administrator (he seems like a nice guy, but is prone to banning, editing and deleting to keep his boards squeaky clean; some people like a squeaky clean board, I don't).
As far as other things...almost anything goes, within reason. Whatever your opinion is, fine. If you swear a little, fine. People even talk about smoking pot in the mountains. And then there's Fight On who talks about the evils of caffeine. If anything, I occasionally hear mild complaints about too much freedom of speech.
---------------------------------------------------------------
You think it was appropriate to say that about his 9-year-old son? Halhiker doesn't have the word "fight" in his username. Nothing was deleted.Fight On wrote:And more surprised that he asked me and not him if I knew the forum wasn't about fighting.
For what it's worth, you do make the board interesting. It would be a little boring if you stopped posting.
---------------------------------------------------------------
A board about everything fun would be fun... As far as merging, that is complicated and can involved headaches:
http://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopi ... 5#p1120893
http://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopi ... ilit=merge
If anyone browses those 25 pages, you can see it doesn't work too good. And there's the issue of converting the two phpBB2 forums to phpBB3.
An easier way is to use the link feature in phpBB3 where a category or forum title can link to a totally separate web site. So all the boards could be interlinked except, ahem, the San Gorgonio board which is stuck in the stone age. phpBB2 boards require a little editing to add links or an upgrade to phpBB3 is easier if the database is small enough to avoid server timeouts. I think this forum might be able to do it. Otherwise you have to run the converter inside a virtual php server environment on a PC.
As far as transferring, there may be some scripts that can do that, using admin access and copying everyone's email addresses. A mass email would be an easy way to notify everyone.
This person purchased a database from his free forum provider:
http://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopi ... &t=1152475
There's a lot of useful stuff here:
http://www.phpbb.com/community/
The phpBB experts are ready to answer questions...
---------------------------------------------------------------
3 people? Are you counting Janice, Crystal, and Jennifer? (same person) Now you don't seriously think that person should be given another chance? And the organic spammer can hardly be considered a person. He was posting meaningless comments about hiking, just to promote his Tenerife vacation web site. He was doing this on every type of message board from basket weaving to pet chihuahuas, etc. The weather guy just quit because I called him out on his bullshit by asking difficult questions. None of his posts were deleted, and he is still welcome to post... He was almost banned, people wanted him banned, but it didn't quite happen. Should I invite him back?...Fight On wrote:I've seen Perry ban 3 people.
Do you want both of the weather guys to post here? Just go to the San G board and say you need Mt. Baldy forecasts with special warnings for hikers. Then ask them who is the best weather forecaster and what they think of other forecasters and the National Weather Service. Be sure to link back to here...
No, I don't spend enough time over there to give specific examples.Maxwell's Demon wrote:Could you provide some specific examples?simonov wrote:...never been crazy about Perry as a moderator/administrator (he seems like a nice guy, but is prone to banning, editing and deleting to keep his boards squeaky clean; some people like a squeaky clean board, I don't).
I have no idea what this is a reference to, but if you are suggesting Perry was banning or editing people because of their opinions about tourists on the tram, I'd say that's one of the examples you seek right there.If you are referring to a very fragile biological system that is close to the tram, have you seen how the tourists treat the wilderness?
See, I harbor a deep distrust of the motives of people who say things like that.If anything, I occasionally hear mild complaints about too much freedom of speech.
Nunc est bibendum
The truth hurts, if it applies. Only the people who eat that stuff for vanity and have a conscience get their feelings hurt. Those who don't, don't care. I can't help that. At least they have a conscience though.Maxwell's Demon wrote:As far as other things...almost anything goes, within reason. Whatever your opinion is, fine. If you swear a little, fine. People even talk about smoking pot in the mountains. And then there's Fight On who talks about the evils of caffeine. If anything, I occasionally hear mild complaints about too much freedom of speech.
Did you miss this?Maxwell's Demon wrote:You think it was appropriate to say that about his 9-year-old son? Halhiker doesn't have the word "fight" in his username. Nothing was deleted.Fight On wrote:And more surprised that he asked me and not him if I knew the forum wasn't about fighting.
And "FIGHT ON" is the USC slogan. Has nothing to do with anything else.
Never saw a word written about that. other thanhalhiker wrote:Don't think you'd want me on a SAR team. I'd probably leave you out there to follow some other lost soul's misplaced ducks until you perish....and then bury your body in one of those Texas grave mounds.
He forgot to put an emoticon. RIGHT!
That's what I was surprised about.
happy cryingFor what it's worth, you do make the board interesting. It would be a little boring if you stopped posting.
blowing kisses to all my fans out there.
"YOU LIKE ME! YOU REALLY LIKE ME!" - Sally Field
I never really saw much of what that person wrote. I saw a question asking tinabalina about that monkey and shortly after he was gone. I thought doing something to the computer to stop the owner from accessing the site was banning.Maxwell's Demon wrote:3 people? Are you counting Janice, Crystal, and Jennifer? (same person) Now you don't seriously think that person should be given another chance? And the organic spammer can hardly be considered a person. He was posting meaningless comments about hiking, just to promote his Tenerife vacation web site. He was doing this on every type of message board from basket weaving to pet chihuahuas, etc. The weather guy just quit because I called him out on his bullshit by asking difficult questions. None of his posts were deleted, and he is still welcome to post... He was almost banned, people wanted him banned, but it didn't quite happen. Should I invite him back?...Fight On wrote:I've seen Perry ban 3 people.
- Maxwell's Demon
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 7:26 pm
Okay, that was a little harsh for a friendly forum (although a sarcastic joke), but would you agree that you took it a step further by talking about his son?FIGHT ON wrote: Did you miss this?
And "FIGHT ON" is the USC slogan. Has nothing to do with anything else.
Never saw a word written about that. other thanhalhiker wrote:Don't think you'd want me on a SAR team. I'd probably leave you out there to follow some other lost soul's misplaced ducks until you perish....and then bury your body in one of those Texas grave mounds.
He forgot to put an emoticon. RIGHT!
That's what I was surprised about.
That person has a history on this board and both of the Mt. Whitney forums. PM or email if you are curious.FIGHT ON wrote:I never really saw much of what that person wrote.
Lots of people rip on the tourists. Are you suggesting that people cannot post positive messages about tourists? Try it...simonov wrote:if you are suggesting Perry was banning or editing people because of their opinions about tourists on the tram, I'd say that's one of the examples you seek right there.
The more you post, the less coherent you get.Maxwell's Demon wrote: Lots of people rip on the tourists. Are you suggesting that people cannot post positive messages about tourists? Try it...
I really have no idea what this business about the tram and tourists is supposed to be referring to, and you aren't making yourself any clearer.
Nunc est bibendum
What the heck are you guys talkin about?simonov wrote:The more you post, the less coherent you get.Maxwell's Demon wrote: Lots of people rip on the tourists. Are you suggesting that people cannot post positive messages about tourists? Try it...
I really have no idea what this business about the tram and tourists is supposed to be referring to, and you aren't making yourself any clearer.
Simonov, I didn't even see your post at the end of page 1! Sorry I missed it! Excellent post.
I'd like to consolidate stuff on here. I am a big organisation-kinda-guy though, so for myself, it's either a handfull of seperate subforums, or a shitload of stickies (think, current conditions, etc). I do feel that we can lump MOST stuff together, though. That said, I like how you go exactly where you want. Plus, this keeps Fight On in off-topic, for the most part.
I'd like to consolidate stuff on here. I am a big organisation-kinda-guy though, so for myself, it's either a handfull of seperate subforums, or a shitload of stickies (think, current conditions, etc). I do feel that we can lump MOST stuff together, though. That said, I like how you go exactly where you want. Plus, this keeps Fight On in off-topic, for the most part.
I say we give FIGHT ON his own subforum.TacoDelRio wrote:Simonov, I didn't even see your post at the end of page 1! Sorry I missed it! Excellent post.
I'd like to consolidate stuff on here. I am a big organisation-kinda-guy though, so for myself, it's either a handfull of seperate subforums, or a shitload of stickies (think, current conditions, etc). I do feel that we can lump MOST stuff together, though. That said, I like how you go exactly where you want. Plus, this keeps Fight On in off-topic, for the most part.
Nunc est bibendum
I just noticed something on that forum, what is a Moderator? AlanK is the Moderator. I've seen two on the san j forum but what do they do? moderate? moderate what? never saw them do anything. most of the time one guy is never around. everybody is always looking for him. I do like KathyW but seriously what are they for?
what a joke! Taco. you should put me as Moderator!!!!!!!!!!! I would be proud.
what a joke! Taco. you should put me as Moderator!!!!!!!!!!! I would be proud.