Panorama Point

TRs for ranges outside California.
Post Reply
User avatar
JeffH
Posts: 1234
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 7:09 am

Post by JeffH »

June 16, 2020

After spending the night deep in the Nebraska National Forest (I didn't even know that existed) I kept driving toward Kimball, the closest town to the Nebraska highpoint. A few miles on dirt roads led me to a bison ranch where I duly submitted the suggested entrance fee and drove on more dirt road to Panorama Point. It is an interesting panorama, lots of flat ground with large animals grazing and lazing and quite a few windmills sitting idle in the absence of any breeze. No real hiking involved in this one, I parked about 30 yards from the marker although I did wander around a bit for photo opportunities.


0.02 miles, approximately 0.1 feet elevation gain.


DSC05918.jpg
Entrance - no locked gate but a double length of cattle guard across the dirt road.


DSC05922.jpg
High point from the road.


DSC05924.jpg
Summit marker, lists the elevation as 5424.


DSC05925.jpg
View of my hiking route.


DSC05926.jpg
Summit pose. I'm the tallest person in the state right here.


DSC05928.jpg
I didn't actually take a panorama shot but you can get the idea of the local landscape here.


DSC05932.jpg
Local wildlife. These animals are huge.
"Argue for your limitations and sure enough they're yours".
Donald Shimoda
User avatar
HikeUp
Posts: 3932
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:21 pm

Post by HikeUp »

Was that 0.1 feet elevation gain both ways?
User avatar
JerryN
Posts: 200
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:01 pm

Post by JerryN »

I hope you were prepared for the climb
User avatar
dima
Posts: 1521
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:35 am
Location: Los Angeles

Post by dima »

Thanks for posting that! I would have expected such a flat high-point to have a much lower elevation, but that's what it is. I guess the plains are tilted.
User avatar
JerryN
Posts: 200
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:01 pm

Post by JerryN »

2011 Hike to the summit
NB Panorama Point 2011.jpg
User avatar
David R
OG of the SG
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:28 pm

Post by David R »

Further proof that Nebraska doesn't really exist.
User avatar
JeffH
Posts: 1234
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 7:09 am

Post by JeffH »

dima wrote: Thanks for posting that! I would have expected such a flat high-point to have a much lower elevation, but that's what it is. I guess the plains are tilted.
The plains are actually at a pretty high elevation as the ground slopes up from the Mississippi River to the Rockies. Kansas was nearly 5000 feet too. And Nebraska has some hills but they are in the northern part of the state. This photo is while I was driving out of the National Forest.
DSC05912.jpg
"Argue for your limitations and sure enough they're yours".
Donald Shimoda
User avatar
Tom Kenney
Posts: 385
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:51 pm

Post by Tom Kenney »

"I didn't actually take a panorama"

You could paste together 3 copies of that shot, and it'd fool me for sure! ?
User avatar
Girl Hiker
Posts: 1403
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 7:46 am
Contact:

Post by Girl Hiker »

Did you get elevation sickness? Lol
"Never limit yourself to what you can do!"
--Bart Yasso, my hero
Instagram My Blog
User avatar
Sean
Cucamonga
Posts: 4052
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:32 pm

Post by Sean »

Tom Kenney wrote: "I didn't actually take a panorama"

You could paste together 3 copies of that shot, and it'd fool me for sure! ?
Actually I thought it was a panorama until he said it wasn't.
Post Reply