"Sanctum" Movie Night at Citywalk

cougarmagic · Post by **cougarmagic** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 8:13 pm

Went to see this new caving disaster flick with some friends Saturday night.

It scared me. I had nightmares. Not kidding.

A caving friend of mine (I do not cave, and now never EVER will. not for a million dollars) found it a little more hokey, and less scary, but still thought it was exciting.

Despite what the promotions lead you to believe, James Cameron only produced this movie - he didn't direct it. Which is kind of a bummer for the real director, who is quite good, but will get no attention for his work!

We didn't think the 3D was really necessary. There were some cool shots, but overall it has substance other than the 3D gimmick and underwater cinematography/special effects.

For adventure movies, I rate it somewhere between Verical Limit (godawful) and 127 Hours (excellent). It was more violent and graphic than I expected. I'd recommend it if you're into caving, diving, or just like to pay money be disturbed and stressed out on a weekend.

AlanK · Post by **AlanK** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 8:17 pm

cougarmagic wrote: ↑For adventure movies, I rate it somewhere between Verical Limit (godawful) and 127 Hours (excellent).

But... but... Vertical Limit revealed to the world the essential link between serious mountaineering and copious amounts of nitroglycerine. 8)

cougarmagic · Post by **cougarmagic** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 8:33 pm

AlanK wrote: ↑ the essential link between serious mountaineering and copious amounts of nitroglycerine. 8)

Yes this is true! Also, the great technique of getting a running start before leaping a 20' wide crevasse with an ice axe in each hand (to sink into the edge on the other side!)

And watching the snow leopards play from the comfort of base camp.

bertfivesix · Post by **bertfivesix** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 8:47 pm

But without Vertical Limit, we wouldn't know to CHECK OUR SAFETY or that a cam will walk out slowly and hold 2 people but not 3!

cougarmagic · Post by **cougarmagic** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 8:59 pm

It's just too good not to share again:

davantalus · Post by **davantalus** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 10:02 pm

cougarmagic wrote: ↑It's just too good not to share again

Hahaha! Never caught that spoof.

I saw Sanctum opening night with a bunch of friends. We all agreed it was a little hokey. The review I thought nailed it best was, "3-dimensional cave, 2-dimensional characters."

Unfortunately our theater wasn't 3d so I still kinda want to see it again in 3d to see if it was any good.

We really really didn't need the hair-caught-in-rack scene to be that graphic

cougarmagic · Post by **cougarmagic** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:04 am

davantalus wrote: ↑We really really didn't need the hair-caught-in-rack scene to be that graphic

Agreed!! I also thought maybe just one mercy drowning would have been enough.

davantalus · Post by **davantalus** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 10:30 am

cougarmagic wrote: ↑I also thought maybe just one mercy drowning would have been enough.

Completely forgot about that! In unrelated news it's time to get my hair cut and recharge my headlamp batteries.

By the way, I read an amazing story a few years back about a cave diver. It's pretty long but well worth it - http://outsideonline.com/outside/featur ... haw-1.html

Post by **Hikin_Jim** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 12:40 pm

Yipes. Tough read. I guess the end of the article (page 11) is omitted for some reason? When I click on page 11, it just displays page 1.

HJ

davantalus · Post by **davantalus** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 10:53 am

Working links to page 10 and page 11. Their link parsing system is broken for double digit page number it would appear.

Post by **Hikin_Jim** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:40 am

davantalus wrote: ↑Working links to page 10 and page 11. Their link parsing system is broken for double digit page number it would appear.

Ah. Thank you. A tough read, but an article worth finishing. Disregard what it says about ghosts. That part was dumb and misleading.

HJ