
Anytime you can prove that radar doesn't work the way they claim it does and get out of a ticket is Niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

I can't believe people aren't up in arms about this! These criminal bastards are robbing us! Just like how some cities have reduced the yellow signal time on red light camera controlled intersections to get more tickets!!With a tightening budget, Pasadena officials hope to be the first jurisdiction to permit police officers to wield radar guns on roads with radically lowered speed limits. According to the Senate's own analysis, Pasadena's primary purpose is increasing the number of traffic tickets issued, not safety.
"When asked if there were a safety issue associated with speed on these streets, the city of Pasadena was not able to provide evidence that there was a higher collision rate, or any other type of incident that would indicate a safety problem," the Senate Transportation Committee's bill analysis explained. "Posting a lower speed limit, however, is not likely to slow traffic down. The 85th percentile has long been used as the standard for setting speed limits because experience has shown that the majority of people drive at a speed that feels safe for the conditions. If the conditions do not change on the roadway, drivers will continue to drive at their current speed. Because this bill allows for radar enforcement on segments that were not justified on the grounds of an engineering and traffic survey, this situation will likely cause more motorists to be cited for speeding."
So wonder how the assailant is feeling now that they've woke up?TacoDelRio wrote:Assault against a peace officer... wow...
I've emailed him before - nice guy.cougarmagic wrote:Anyone know how to email Gary Valle (the bear cubs on the South Fork trail caught my eye - I was just there setting a camera the day after he saw them). I try clicking on the "email" button on his page, but my Mail system isn't set up right, and it won't let me do it.
I wonder how many hikers it took for him to get that big. (buuuurp)cougarmagic wrote:That bear is AMAZING!! He looks so fat and healthy. How cool!
Someone needs to check their geography skills. The article it linked to mentions it being between Santa Clarita and the SG's; not the Santa Ana's.
I got the map! 8) This one goes wayyyy back in time.Rumpled wrote: Someone needs to check their geography skills. The article it linked to mentions it being between Santa Clarita and the SG's; not the Santa Ana's.
I know they made a mistake, but the correct info should read between the SANTA SUSANA'S and the San Gabriel mountains. That's where Newhall Pass is located, although the lion was killed on the 5 near the Calgrove exit.
Are you trying to get yourself banned?outwhere wrote:And really, these SELFISH, don't even know if can call them people, that drive their silly cars so dangerously on a PUBLIC road.
I'm sorry but they need to be shot just as badly as the people that break into cars.
It is nearly impossible to tell who does and who doesn't. One would have to be familiar with the special skillsets that dictate fast driving on a mountain road (single-lane lines, controlling under and oversteer in a single lane with certain chassis, maximizing traction on varied road surfaces), and they'd either have to follow the individual, or be with them, riding shotgun. Since people might see a car going quickly on a road, they may not agree with it, and have an emotional response, without having a logical response (or the knowledge in that area to back one up), that of "well, he was clean, and he left room for other drivers, and driver error or rocks on the road, etc etc on and on".It's tough to sort out who has skills and who doesn't in real time, on real roads.
TacoDelRio wrote:If anyone doubts my safety, ethics, whatever, I welcome you to go for a drive with me.