Hawks Peak from Falls Ridge

TRs for the San Gabriel Mountains.
Post Reply
User avatar
Uncle Rico
Posts: 1442
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:48 pm

Post by Uncle Rico »

Yesterday on a whim, I went back to the Angeles for some unfinished business. I wanted to get to Hawks Peak but didn't want to tread the same ground I did recently, so decided to approach from the Angeles Crest Station instead of the end of Harter Lane. The potential downside to that approach is a long, boring road walk along 2N76 which folds back on itself innumerable times as it climbs away from the ACH. But the CalTopo MapBuilder layer shows a path branching off 2N76 near its beginning and climbing to a a ridge on the north side of Falls Canyon, so I decided to give that a go. As far as I can tell, the ridge doesn't have any formal name, so I'm just calling it Falls Ridge.

The route starts from the gate right past the firehouse. A easy to see and well defined use path veers right into the minor drainage right at the gate. It then begins climbing to the ridge in earnest on a steep, narrow, loose, and sometimes rocky guerrilla trail. There's a couple of spots with some exposure where the "trail" has washed away, but its all manageable.
1.jpg
2.jpg
Eventually, you crest the ridge proper and get some relief as the path tacks west along the flat ridgeline. Then there is one more steepish climb before you pop out on 2N76 a short distance east of the mailbox at the gate leading to the teepee. According to my app, in total, going up the ridge cuts about 1.25 miles off the climb.
3.jpg
4.jpg
5.jpg
6.jpg
Anyway, its a relative short road walk from this point to the base of southern ridge leading to Hawks' summit. There is a less defined use trail that follows the ridge up, but it is obvious. There was some brush to contend with but nothing serious. There is a sea of I suppose it is buckwheat just below the summit that you have to contend with, but I was in shorts and had no real problem. Looking at the ridge from the road, I just followed the path of red (buckwheat and chamise).

The summit is relatively flat and affords decent views of the surrounding area. There is a register on the summit in which I noted DavidR's most recent entry. There is also a red ant nest immediately adjacent to the rock pile in which the register sits so I had to move off a bit to avoid getting stung while I picked the stickers and other clingy stuff out of my socks.
7.jpg
8.jpg
9.jpg
10.jpg
11.jpg
12.jpg
13.jpg
14.jpg
15.jpg
On the return trip, I retraced my steps back to the fireroad and then followed it all the way back to Angeles Crest Station. Just so I could say I'd been there. And to avoid the downclimb on the ridge route. On the way down, I noticed some rock retaining walls and check dams that looked like they were probably built during a bygone era. Anyone know anything about these? The rockwork was pretty impressive. Which is why I didn't take any pics of it. Doh!
User avatar
Sean
Cucamonga
Posts: 4067
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:32 pm

Post by Sean »

Thanks for the report. I think it was after the '38 flood, the County went nuts installing check dams and retaining walls throughout the front range. The Arroyo Seco watershed, especially, saw a lot of attention. The Brown Mountain Dam, for example, was built in 1943, so I bet a lot of the other flood control structures around the Arroyo Seco were built at that time or in the following decades.

Also, the highway construction began in 1929. So maybe it has something to do with that.
User avatar
Nate U
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2023 7:38 pm

Post by Nate U »

This sounds like something I would be doing!

I appreciate your Mt Lukens sub-peak completionism streak 😆
User avatar
Uncle Rico
Posts: 1442
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:48 pm

Post by Uncle Rico »

I haven't been to Pickens yet. You still interested in that? Anyone else?

Also, anyone know whether the Earl Canyon Fire Road is a viable route to Pickens? Parking/access issues?
User avatar
Nate U
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2023 7:38 pm

Post by Nate U »

Uncle Rico wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 12:31 pm I haven't been to Pickens yet. You still interested in that? Anyone else?
Also, anyone know whether the Earl Canyon Fire Road is a viable route to Pickens? Parking/access issues?
I went about halfway up Earl Canyon Fire Road in February of 2023 with a group of friends, no problems parking, perfectly nice road with a washout here and there.

I'm still interested - if you can devise some kind of loop or point to point that suites you I'd be into it.
User avatar
JeffH
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 7:09 am

Post by JeffH »

Uncle Rico wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 12:31 pm I haven't been to Pickens yet. You still interested in that? Anyone else?

Also, anyone know whether the Earl Canyon Fire Road is a viable route to Pickens? Parking/access issues?
I'll go with you.
"Argue for your limitations and sure enough they're yours".
Donald Shimoda
User avatar
Uncle Rico
Posts: 1442
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:48 pm

Post by Uncle Rico »

Well, we could go up Earl, tag Pickens, then follow the Lukens Fire Road southeast past Hawks (and grab that along the way) to the Teepee, and then down whatever that trail is called (the TeePee Trail) to the end of Harter Lane. Or we could reverse that and go the other direction. Leave a car at each end.

You could also go up Earl, tag Pickens, follow the Lukens Fire Road to Tank Saddle, and then veer right on 2N80(?) to the junction with the Grizzly Flat Trail. Then down Grizzly Flat. Or visa versa. Don't know what condition Grizzly Flat Trail is in. Leave a car at each end.
User avatar
Nate U
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2023 7:38 pm

Post by Nate U »

Uncle Rico wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 7:19 am Well, we could go up Earl, tag Pickens, then follow the Lukens Fire Road southeast past Hawks (and grab that along the way) to the Teepee, and then down whatever that trail is called (the TeePee Trail) to the end of Harter Lane. Or we could reverse that and go the other direction. Leave a car at each end.
I like where your heads at. How about a variation on this which makes it a loop, dropping down (or coming up from) Beckley Canyon with a touch of cross country navigation:
Screen Shot 2024-11-18 at 5.10.03 PM.png
When I was on Earl road, Beckley looked kind of intriguing. Lots of big trees.
Screen Shot 2024-11-18 at 5.08.59 PM.png
7.32 miles, 3,346 ft of gain. Can't decide which direction I'd want to go? Maybe come down Earl?

.kml of the route attached.
Pickens and Pals loop.kml
(12.33 KiB) Downloaded 5 times
User avatar
JeffH
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 7:09 am

Post by JeffH »

CalTopo makes it look a little easier, only 2670 feet of gain.
Screen Shot 2024-11-18 at 6.47.54 PM.png
"Argue for your limitations and sure enough they're yours".
Donald Shimoda
User avatar
Uncle Rico
Posts: 1442
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:48 pm

Post by Uncle Rico »

I know nothing of Beckley Canyon, but willing to give it a go. I think we ascend Beckley and descend Earl. Better to know what's ahead and how long it will take on the way out then on the way in IMO.
User avatar
Uncle Rico
Posts: 1442
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:48 pm

Post by Uncle Rico »

Hmmm. I don't know about Hall Beckley.

http://brennen.caltech.edu/advents/halbec.htm
User avatar
Uncle Rico
Posts: 1442
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:48 pm

Post by Uncle Rico »

On second look, your proposed route doesn't get us that far up Beckley to worry about the challenges Brennen talks about.

Any idea if there is a firebreak along that ridge out of the canyon? Those south-facing slopes are pretty dang brushy.
User avatar
tekewin
Posts: 1270
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 5:07 pm

Post by tekewin »

Nicely done! The views from there are surprisingly good.
Post Reply