Waterman and Twin Peaks from Buckhorn May 10

TRs for the San Gabriel Mountains.
Post Reply
User avatar
JMunaretto
Posts: 370
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 11:03 am

Post by JMunaretto »

Finally did this hike after hearing the trail was in good condition (thanks Mike P!)

On the drive up, we happily ascending through the cloud layer. I believe that's Monrovia Peak in the back



Started the hike about 9:30 and on the way quickly saw the east ridge up to Twin Peaks, and thought, hey that looks like a pretty cool climb!



I really like this area. Smells great. Pretty isolated. Just quality.



Normally we go on up and down hikes, but I kept warning the 5 who joined up that we'd be going up and down, up and down, up and down...and that this twin would be a PITA!



They thought it wasn't bad so far



What is this?



The heliport is assuredly there to lift away those too exhausted after getting up the twins



Even this very strong hiker was getting a taxing workout



What this shirt really means is USC 'builds' championships by buying players. (woops off topic)



My calves were pissed going up to Twin Peaks. They are my limiting factor when hiking steep stuff. Gotta get rid of that!



Awesome views from the East twin.



The group



Pretty purple



The group really liked this hike...they think its harder than going up the Ski Hut route to Baldy, and I can see that being true b/c the part up the twins was steeper than any part of Ski hut but also because of the repeated up and down stuff. Oh, and there were a shit load of flies, that was kinda annoying!

I measured 4200 ft gain, seems about right. Seems like an 11 mile hike. Definitely one to do again.

http://picasaweb.google.com/jmunaretto/ ... aksMay2008
User avatar
HikeUp
Posts: 3932
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:21 pm

Post by HikeUp »

Thanks for the TR and for sharing the pics.

The red thing is a snowplant.
User avatar
Mike P
Posts: 1005
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 10:48 pm

Post by Mike P »

I agree, JM, that this hike was tougher for me than Ski Hut to Baldy. Its not nearly as long but certainly steeper. This peak is a "fun" peak and definitely worth doing again.

How was the snow?
User avatar
Taco
Snownado survivor
Posts: 6036
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 4:35 pm

Post by Taco »

I've also had those red plants termed as "Pine Drops" in some of my books.

Looks like y'all enjoyed some CLEAN SGW Backcountry!
User avatar
AW~
Posts: 2064
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:00 pm

Post by AW~ »

well its not clean if you have flies swarming your face... :( Did these flies bother you a lot at the top or was this more of being a bullseye target on the way up or down? Any report on water sources?
User avatar
JMunaretto
Posts: 370
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 11:03 am

Post by JMunaretto »

AW wrote:well its not clean if you have flies swarming your face... :( Did these flies bother you a lot at the top or was this more of being a bullseye target on the way up or down? Any report on water sources?
The flies were all over the place after the first saddle. I honestly only really noticed them when I stopped. I don't remember them on top of Waterman but think there were some on top of twins.

There is a creek like 0.5 miles up from the start at Buckhorn. Then, when heading down to the saddle before going up Twin Peaks, there is a small, non-dry creek, but from what I remember there's not much water. There's an itty bitty amount, I honestly can't remember in more specific detail.
User avatar
Dudley Heinsbergen
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:02 pm

Post by Dudley Heinsbergen »

i cant believe i was skiing there 3 months ago!
Post Reply