Williamson Rock will reopen

Trip planning, history, announcements, books, movies, opinions, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
MikeSash
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 7:07 pm

Post by MikeSash »

If you'd like it to, please follow the link and send an email!

http://www.supertopo.com/climbing/threa ... _id=779472
User avatar
EManBevHills
Posts: 387
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:40 am

Post by EManBevHills »

User avatar
Nate
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:41 pm

Post by Nate »

Is this the one that was closed because of some endangered frog or something like that??
User avatar
Hikin_Jim
Posts: 4686
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:04 pm

Post by Hikin_Jim »

Exactly.
User avatar
Rumpled
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 10:57 pm

Post by Rumpled »

Saw this on the Wrightwood forum

Williamson Rock Temporary Closure Resolution

The Angeles National Forest is asking for Public comments on a proposal to resolve the existing temporary closure in the Williamson Rock vicinity.

Williamson Rock is located on National Forest System lands within the Santa Clara-Mojave Rivers Ranger District, in upper Little Rock Canyon, Los Angeles County, California. The proposed action involves portions of T. 3N, R. 9W, Section 7, and T. 3N, R. 10W, Sections 11, 12, 13, and 14, SBM. The proposed action would reopen the area to dispersed recreation while providing required protection for Federally-listed biological species. The Forest is soliciting public input for the issues to be addressed in the environmental analysis.

Comments must be received within 45 days from the publication date of this notice (09/12). This comment period provides interested parties, including those affected by the proposal, an opportunity to make their concerns known.

Comments may be mailed to Williamson Rock ID Team, ATTN: Darrell Vance, Angeles National Forest, 701 N. Santa Anita Ave, Arcadia, CA 91006, or electronically at dvance@fs.fed.us.


Here's the pdf of how they will manage the area under the proposal.
Pretty restrictive in my opinion; though less so than now.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/angeles/project ... ressee.pdf


ANF Web listing
http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/angeles/projects/

PDF map of area with proposal
http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/angeles/projects/maps/PA_WR.pdf
User avatar
HikeUp
Posts: 3932
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:21 pm

Post by HikeUp »

Thanks for posting this! If I'm reading it right, the PCT would be re-opened (with some minor(?) re-routing) through the area. I'm all for that! Would open up some areas to hiking that I haven't seen, and it would keep the PCT'ers off the ACH (much safer I'd think).

And since I'm not a climber, I have no opinion (hard to believe?) on the net effect to climbing in the area. :)
User avatar
Taco
Snownado survivor
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 4:35 pm

Post by Taco »

Wait, what about the speckled fly? Once they reopen the place, the flies will be in danger!

Doesn't anyone care anymore?! GO GREEN!
User avatar
Rumpled
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 10:57 pm

Post by Rumpled »

Not gonna reopen. Station fire is an excuse to keep it closed as a last refuge. till 12-31-2010


http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/angeles/orders/ ... eOrder.pdf
User avatar
Taco
Snownado survivor
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 4:35 pm

Post by Taco »

HAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA

What a surprise!
User avatar
EManBevHills
Posts: 387
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:40 am

Post by EManBevHills »

What's with the Acting Forest Supervisor bit?
User avatar
Rumpled
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 10:57 pm

Post by Rumpled »

EManBevHills wrote:What's with the Acting Forest Supervisor bit?
Jody on vacation?
Leave?
Being kicked out the door?
Post Reply